Page 21 - Watchman- What of the Night
P. 21

Chapter V: Tribulation and Wrath



                     We  concluded  our  last  chapter  with  the  statement  that  there  is  a  clearly  defined
                   distinction in scripture between the use of the word ―tribulation‖ and the use of the
                   word ―wrath.‖ This distinction can be established and maintained, and is not merely

                   asserted.
                     In interpreting scripture it is important that correct distinctions shall be made. If not,
                   there will be a loss in understanding. But such distinctions in the uses of words and

                   phrases  must  be  legitimate  and  reasonable,  drawn  from  enough  occurrences  of  the
                   words or phrases in the sacred text, with a sufficiently defined cleavage, to warrant
                   the  making  of  such  distinctions.  To  allege  distinctions  that  violate  the  laws  of
                   language, logic and sound hermenteutics is worse than nothing and creates confusion
                   unbounded.  The  Darby-Kelly-Scofield-Gaebelein  school  of  eschatology  has  been

                   guilty of this very thing, and has gendered endless confusion and error as a result. The
                   average reader of such prophetic material is overawed by the eminence of the authors
                   and accepts their statements ex cathedra. He does not stop to weigh the matter or to

                   consider whether the distinctions made are tenable or sensible, and does not even look
                   up the scriptures to check on the correctness of the statements. If he did, he would be
                   disillusioned  regarding  the  accuracy  of  his  ―sources.‖  It  was  when  this  writer  was
                   persuaded to examine and prove these things, after having accepted them for years at
                   their face value, that found a multitude of errors, and a large part of the structure to be

                   ingeniously fictitious.
                     Having committed themselves to the hypothesis of three comings of Christ, or split
                   stages of the second coming, they are compelled to resort to every variety of twisting,

                   fantastic  interpretations  and  false  distinctions,  to  support  a  hopeless  case,  ignoring
                   many plain scriptures that completely refute it. The whole approach and technique are
                   reminiscent of the special pleaders for organic evolution. They wish it accepted by the
                   weight of their opinion and not by specific evidence. Incidentally this view arose at
                   about  the  same  time  that  organic  evolution,  the  so-called  Higher  Criticism,  and

                   Marxism matured and crystallized. We will demonstrate this in more detail later.
                     For the distinction we are about to make between tribulation and wrath we invite
                   the careful investigation and research of evert reader. To aid in this we will append a

                   list of references from a Greek concordance of the words dealt with.
                     The Greek word often translated ‗tribulation‘ appears 44 times in the N.T., and is
                   translated  as  follows:  ‗burdened‘  once,  ‗anguish‘  once,  ‗affliction‘  or  ‗afflicted‘  17
                   times, ‗tribulation‘21 times, ‗persecution‘ once, ‗trouble‘ three times. Of these 44 uses
                   of the Greek noun there are 36 that are distinctly and directly related to the sufferings
                                                            21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26