Page 32 - The Divine Unfolding of God's Plan of Redemption
P. 32

The first step, then, in the Satanic approach, is the insinuation that God has not
            spoken. If this idea can be established it removes all responsibility from the individual

            to heed any higher authority, and there is no accountability whatever. The certain and
            logical conclusion of this state of mind is that we are debtors to the flesh, to live after
            the flesh, and should give vent to every urge of nature. Little wonder that when the
            foundations of the Word of God have been blasted away there grows on its ruins the

            cult of “Self-expression.” Little wonder that the very same teachers, spawns of hell,
            who  tell  the  youth  that  God  has  not  spoken,  urge  them  to  go  out  and  indulge
            themselves  in  any  way  they  see  fit.  Denial  of  divine  authority  has  as  its  logical
            conclusion the glorification of lust. The tempter grows bolder. First a question as to

            whether God has spoken, then a categorical denial—a direct contradiction of what the
            woman  has  clearly  understood  as  being  the  divine  prohibition,  together  with  the
            warning in the event of disobedience.


                “Ye shall not surely die,” asserts the dragon. He is the author of death and the
            prince of death, and he desires to discount it altogether or to minimize its importance.
            A  benign  Creator  warns  that  a  certain  course  of  procedure  will  result  in  death:  a
            vicious creature denies it. Every child of Adam of the millions and millions who have

            lived in the world (except Enoch and Elijah, who were granted special reprieves by
            God Himself) have died to prove God true and Satan a liar, and yet the lie persists, and
            men love darkness rather than light. They choose a murderer and crucify the Prince of
            life.


                First a question, then a contradiction, and lastly a false promise! Having allayed
            her fears by telling her that there can no punishment result from a disobedience of
            God,  the  tempter  moves  one  step  farther  and  assaults  the  character  of  God  and

            undertakes to establish an evil motive for what the woman still feels He has said. “For
            God doth know that in the day ye „eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened and ye
            shall be as God [why the translators rendered the great Elohim by the little generic
            plural „gods‟ remains a mystery], knowing good and evil.”


                “So  that  is  the  reason,”  thought  Eve,  “that  He  told  us  not  to  eat  of  it.  He  has
            confined our little authority to this earth, when our lofty talents should qualify us to

            share the government of the universe with Elohim. Probably the dragon is right!” The
            erstwhile  anointed  cherub  is  up  to  his  old  tricks.  He  had  managed  to  convince  a
            myriad  of  angels  that  he  and  they  should  be  “like  the  Most  High.”  The  lie  had
            rebounded against him with devastating results, but it still  remained good bait, and
            remains so till this day. The evolutionists still spin that gossamer web (at the dragon‟s


                                                           24
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37